Goodbye to Sierra

Posted in Uncategorized on June 14, 2010 by Mike

Laura and I had to make the decision this past week to put down our oldest cat, Sierra, who had been with us since ’98.  She had cancer that treatments just weren’t affecting and we could tell she was just not the same cat she had been just a few months ago.  Anyone who’s been through this kind of decision knows how difficult a choice it is.

Sierra was  a bit stand-offish when it came to people – particularly at get-togethers we’d have Sierra would spend more time in our bedroom away from the strangers, only venturing out when she thought it was time to be fed.  She was a sweet cat, though, and would often jump in Laura’s lap at night while we were watching TV and force Laura to pay attention to her.  She was Laura’s cat, much as Sam had been mine.

Sierra had been on chemo and other medications to increase her appetite the past couple weeks, though it still didn’t keep her from growing skinny, almost frail.  She didn’t eat much of her food when I put it down for her, and then I would need to pick up her bowl to keep her food from being scarfed down by Finncat.  He probably thinks he’s being punished now that he no longer gets that extra food with Sierra being gone.  But I noticed when I got out the bag of Cheetos, Sierra was right in my lap, even aggressive as she begged for those crunchy orange puffs.  I was glad to oblige.

Sierra had always been a devil at the vet, so Laura left the office early Friday afternoon with one of her techs who had always been able to control Sierra when we had to draw blood on her.  We took Sierra out to our porch – there was a steady breeze running through the trees and the sun had finally come out after a week of steady rain.  The catheter was placed in with little trouble, and I held Sierra as Laura injected the anesthesia that put her to sleep.  The last injection was then made and we said goodbye to our sweet cat.

Finn and Fiona remain to make our house a home, as Twain would have said, but we miss you, Sierra.

I love it when a plan comes together…

Posted in teaching on May 14, 2010 by Mike

…I’m speaking about the AP Language Exam and the year’s preparation BRP and I led for our AP students.  Want some proof?  Here’s a prompt we gave the AP kids earlier this semester after studying Catch-22 (I created this one a few years ago and come back to it on occasion):

Mark Twain, in a short work entitled The Chronicle of Young Satan, wrote the following.

Will a day come when the race will detect the funniness of these juvenilities and laugh at them–and by laughing at them destroy them? For your race, in its poverty, has unquestionably one really effective weapon–laughter. Power, Money, Persuasion, Supplication, Persecution–these can lift at a colossal humbug,–push it a little– crowd it a little–weaken it a little, century by century: but only Laughter can blow it to rags and atoms at a blast. Against the assault of Laughter nothing can stand.

Write a thoughtful and carefully constructed essay in which you use specific evidence to defend, challenge, or qualify the assertion that laughter is the “one really effective weapon.”

Now, here’s the argumentative prompt from this year’s AP exam:

In his 2004 book, Status Anxiety, Alain de Botton argues that the chief aim of humorists is not merely to entertain but “to convey with impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to say directly.” Because society allows humorists to say things that other people cannot or will not say, de Botton sees humorists as serving a vital function in society.

Think about the implications of de Botton’s view of the role of humorists (cartoonists, stand-up comics, satirical writers, hosts of television programs, etc.). Then write an essay that defends, challenges or qualifies de Botton’s claim about the vital role of humorists. Use specific, appropriate evidence to develop your position.

I am REALLY looking forward to seeing the mean score for our students on this prompt.

You know the line...

The AP Exam…

Posted in teaching, Uncategorized on May 13, 2010 by Mike

…my students apparently feel like they kicked the test’s butt up and down and back again yesterday.  Without telling me specific prompts, they suggested that we had covered many of the ideas reflected in the three essays they were asked to write.  Makes me all fuzzy inside to see them actually excited about how they performed on a test.

Now the waiting begins…we’ll get the results back in early July.

I’ve got 31 research papers left…

Posted in Uncategorized on May 10, 2010 by Mike

…and I’m facing a huge feeling of disappointment in many of my students, which then leads to disappointment in myself.

I tell my students every time a paper comes due that a “C” is actually very easy to get in an Intro to Comp class.  Here’s how it’s done:

1) edit your papers – avoid fragments and run-ons and other careless errors.

2) have a clear, debatable thesis at the beginning of your essay.

3) get MLA format correct.  I even put the guidelines on the back of their prompts for them to refer to as they write.

If those three rules are accomplished, I can practically guarantee that the student’s paper will earn at least a C.

BUT (and you knew this was coming) I could count on one hand the number of papers I’ve graded that actually seem to accomplish all three of the above rules.  Some students obviously haven’t proofed their papers (which leads to problems with #2 and #3).  Others want to tell me that Claudius is a devious guy in Hamlet, or that Hamlet considers suicide until the end of the play (hint: if I think “no shit, Sherlock” at the end of your intro. paragraph, you’re in trouble). And then there are those who seem to think MLA guidelines are more suggestions than hard and fast rules.  They’re not.

This is not to say I’ve only given a hand full of Cs.  Most of the time the editing isn’t too bad, and so that goes a long way with me (not to the extent of an A, but…).  But not bothering with #3 really gets on my last nerve, particularly after I spell out for them the directions both in class, on previous papers, and on the DAMNED PROMPT.

Papers will be given back Wednesday.

Mark Twain died on this day…

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on April 21, 2010 by Mike
“Pity is for the living, envy is for the dead.”
On this day in 1910, Mark Twain shuffled off this mortal coil. Today marks the 100th anniversary of Twain’s death – is there any American author, living or dead, who means so much to American literature and America itself? And is there another author whose writing still speaks so pointedly to us today?
I encourage you all to take some time and read some Twain today, whether it’s revisiting a work from your childhood or a work to which you have not been introduced.

Enjoy!

Thoughts on Freshman Comp.

Posted in teaching with tags , , , on April 16, 2010 by Mike

I teach Freshman Comp. to seniors here at the high school – they earn credit for college English and I earn a second paycheck (for each section!) from the college.  It works out well for all involved.

In this second semester, the focus is on writing about literature, and many of my students appear worried about having to take on Hamlet for their 1500-word research paper due in a couple weeks.  They’ve already signed up for their topics  – from a list of possible topics I gave them six weeks ago – and have written a paper responding to a piece of literary criticism concerning their topic.  We also spent about three weeks on the play itself.  Still, the worry is apparently there.

Here’s what I told them to assuage their fear:

1) This is Freshman Comp – I’m not expecting grad. level analysis from them in this paper. What I’m looking for is a clearly focused essay about a particular aspect of the play.  The thesis should be thoughtful and suggest the importance of their chosen topic to the play.

2) The whole purpose of Freshman Comp. is to prepare them for college-level writing, to get used to the demands and expectations that their future instructors will have.  Many of those expectations center on FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS.  No, you may not have to use MLA format in your upper-level chemistry classes, but you will be expected to follow some type of documentation format.  Knowing the rules of one will prepare you for others.

3) Research is READING.  Students can’t expect to spend 30 minutes on the databases and, voila, have all the sources necessary for the paper. Many of my students expect to find sources that say exactly what they want to say in their papers, but that ain’t gonna happen (and what would be the point of the paper if it did?).  The articles they find need to be read and information/ideas will have to be pulled to add to the discussion they are presenting in their papers.  It’s a time-consuming process.  Sorry if you were planning on knocking the paper out the weekend before it’s due – you’re setting yourself up for failure.

4) Your thoughts are important!  In fact, they’re the most important part of the essay.  Yes, this is a researched paper, but the research should add to your ideas, not be them.  Else, what’s the point?

5) A large part of Freshman Comp. is finding out what type of writer you are – how much time and effort needs to be invested on your part to come up with a final product that won’t be an embarrassment to you when your instructor reads it.  This is useful information to know before moving on to higher level classes.

6) Finally, that quality writing takes time. Yes, there are talented writers who can knock out engaging and clear 1000-word essays in just a couple hours, but these writers are the exception, and I often wonder what these students could produce if they did not rush through their work.  Still, most of my students dislike writing, and it shows in their essays because they approach it as a chore, and something to be done as quickly as possible in order to move on to more enjoyable pursuits.  And then they complain about their inevitable Cs and Ds.

I have  a quote on my door from Thoreau about reading, one that I pray my students read and take to heart:

To read well, that is, to read true books in a true spirit, is a noble exercise, and one that will task the reader more than any exercise which the customs of the day esteem. It requires a training such as the athletes underwent, the steady intention almost of the whole life to this object.

Substitute “writing” for “reading” and you have a pretty good idea about my philosophy of writing: it’s a skill.  Don’t use it, don’t practice it, don’t develop it  (as most students do not), and you can’t expect to be successful at it.

Stoner, by John Williams

Posted in Novels, teaching with tags , , , on March 31, 2010 by Mike

One chapter in, and I’m hooked.  William Stoner, a Missouri farm boy, is given the opportunity by his father to attend the University of Missouri to study agriculture.  Two years in he changes his major to literature, yet is uncertain about what he will do.  He doesn’t tell his parents.

Sloane,  an English professor there at the school, brings him to a realization a year away from graduation:

Sloane leaned forward until his face was close; Stoner saw the lines on the long thin face soften, and he heard the dry mocking voice become gentle and unprotected.

“But don’t you know, Mr. Stoner?” Sloane asked. “Don’t you understand about yourself yet? You’re going to be a teacher.”

Suddenly Sloane seemed very distant, and the walls of the office receded. Stoner felt himself suspended in the wide air, and he heard his voice ask, “Are you sure?”

“I’m sure,” Sloane said softly.

“How can you tell? How can you be sure?”

“It’s love, Mr. Stoner,” Sloane said cheerfully. “You are in love. It’s as simple as that.”

Maybe it is.

My usefulness pondered…

Posted in teaching with tags , , , on March 29, 2010 by Mike

…no, this is not a woe-is-me, I-don’t-mean-anything-to-anybody type of post.  I know I’m valuable – if only to reach the dishes on the top shelves of the cupboard for my wife.  At least it’s something.

Anyway, our illustrious department head brought news of certain changes being planned/considered for next year affecting the way we do things around here.  I won’t start complaining about having to write lesson plans, as I’m not using this post to bitch and moan about such matters.  I’ll leave that for another time when I actually have lesson plans to write.  But our dept. head started talking about time frames for grading papers and then started talking about requiring a certain number of grades per six weeks then started talking about prohibiting all food/drink from the classroom (including water) then talked about something else that I forget because I was fuming about the other things mentioned.

Anyway, a respected colleague and friend of mine (Foxy, as they call her these days), made a suggestion that we look into starting up a charter school and get out of public school and its rules while the getting’s good.  Tempting, but it seems like a lot of work to actually get it going.  And I didn’t get into teaching to actually work (heh – that’s a joke, people).

It was at that point I started wondering what it is I would (let’s not say “could” – that would be too damn depressing, I think) do if I weren’t a teacher.  I’ve known a few teachers to leave the profession and go into various sales positions: real estate, insurance, pot… but I know that kind of job would kill my soul; I hate talking on the phone, much less attempting to convince someone to buy something (sidenote: we’re reading Miller’s Death of a Salesman, and there must be some Biff in me somewhere: “…salesman, business of one kind or another… it’s a measly matter of existence…to suffer fifty weeks of the year for the sake of a two-week vacation”).  Outside of teaching I’ve only held part-time jobs, and being a sandwich artist for Subway wouldn’t be a very satisfying career path.  I fooled around with the idea of becoming a pastor at the end of my college career, but a winter in Minnesota wised me up in that regard. That and I don’t think God wants me talking about Mark Twain and Huck Finn every Sunday.  It’d be too damn expensive to go back to school, and anyway I’d end up getting a doctorate in English because that’s what I’m interested in.

Writing for a living is really the most attractive idea right now,  but I’ve got a wife and kids and a house and dreams of driving a Camaro in a year or two (they’re so pretty!).  And yet I’m feeling a real yearning to write, so much that I can’t stand to look at the stack of papers on my desk.

I’m starting to think it’s time to get serious about what I’ve always felt is a calling.  I’ve wasted a shit-ton of time already.

Flash vs. Superman – Who ya Got?

Posted in Comics with tags , , , , , on March 11, 2010 by Mike

Flash and Superman have had a long history of races with one another.  Leave it to Geoff Johns (Flash: Rebirth #3) to deliver the final answer to who’s the fastest:

Damn right.

Looking more and more like Krasinski’s going to be Cap…

Posted in Comics, Entertainment with tags , , , , , on March 10, 2010 by Mike

Now, this article doesn’t mean it’s definitely going to happen, but signs are beginning to point to John Krasinski being tapped to play Captain America.

Yes, “Jim” from The Office:

is going to be playing the Sentinel of Liberty, Captain America:

Despite my previous post, I’m not going to go throw myself off a building or follow through on my threat to drive out to California and burn Hollywood down.  I’m going to play the bigger man, and try to give Krasinski the benefit of the doubt here; hey, at least he can act, unlike many of the other candidates for the role.

And while Ji-, er, John Krasinski isn’t the ideal actor physically, and does not seem to have the necessary charisma to play Bucky, much less Captain America, I’ve only seen him in The Office where he’s supposed to act like a sarcastic yet admirable everyman slacker, and Leatherheads with Clooney where he played a gifted football player (problem is, I never could get “Jim” out of my head).  It also doesn’t help that those are both comedies, either, and I expect Captain America the movie to be heavy on action and drama.

But what I do know about Krasinski as a person I like.  He’s an English major and was  an English teacher before he became an actor, for God’s sake.  Hell, maybe I’m just jealous that he gets to play my all-time favorite superhero.  There but for seven years and a lack of acting experience goes me, right?

God, I hope that’s it, and I’m letting the green-eyed monster blind me to the possibility he might just pull this off.

/please please please don’t screw this up

UPDATE:

And then there’s this, which declares Krasinski’s out of the running.  I’m so confused!